News Report – The Agitator

24 September 2009 | Lupen Crook | Crooked| 7 Comments so far »

If you would like to find out more about terrorist activites in and around The Medway Towns please look to the right side bar of this website where you will find links to our f(r)iends Medway Eyes and Monaxle. For your own safety Lupen Crook advises all budding photographers to snap happy only in the comfort of their home, away from natural light, and to avoid children and any household items that may contain logos, slogans, and corporate identities that are not solely owned by the photographer.

7 Responses

  1. Phil Dillon on 24 September 2009 at 18:21 says:

    Thank you for bringing this to your audience’s attention. It’s not just about photographers (who are now painfully aware of the law and their rights). It could happen to anyone in the street with or without a camera. We are all under suspicion from a seemingly unaccountable state, and that suspicion runs from Big Brother itself, right down to the bored, power-crazed little cock who squeals into his walkie-talkie from the darkest corner of Poundland in Chatham every time he sees a camera fifty yards away, simply to assuage his boredom.

  2. Sweet Fanny on 24 September 2009 at 18:41 says:

    Thanks for posting the film. Orwell’s surveillance society is as real as I am. The thought police are already controlling us, feeding the media, telling us what to think. When the dictionaries start shrinking, it’s all over. Freedom. Liberty. Rebellion. Revolution. Never let these words be forgotten.

  3. Hg on 24 September 2009 at 20:46 says:

    “If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — forever.”

    The scariest thing about 1984 is the way that it challenges the concept that “they” can control your life, but they can’t control what you think. It mercilessly, logically and ruthlessly describes EXACTLY how this happens.

    Fear is the key. In 1984‘s Room 101 they use Winston Smith’s worst fear to break him. In the Dysunited Kingdom of 2009, the fear is spread by more insidious means: officious harassment, media hysteria and the constant low-level bullying of ten thousand penalty warning signs.

    “… the only thing we have to fear is fear itself — nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance.”

    - Franklin D Roosevelt

  4. dAnBeRToL on 25 September 2009 at 8:18 says:

    Crikey! Chatham Specsavers gets some quality window action! I work at the Dunfermline Specsavers and all we get is junkie shoplifters!

    Statistically, I think logic and rationale still have the upper hand in Britain at the moment. Unfortunately it’s The Man and their kiss-ass minions who have shit for brains!

  5. joe9t on 25 September 2009 at 11:15 says:

    i think the main problem is stupid bobbys of the beat. they can’t seperate so called “terrorists” (in chatham?!) from innocent people. They read a bit of paper and set something in their mind and dont move from it. The same thing happened at the g20 protests.
    more Liberties are for sure being taking away day by day in the name of defending england which is utter bollocks. the film “taKING liberties” (although a bit old) is a must watch for anyone who still thinks england is not a police state.
    I live in Canterbury and complains against kent police have doubled in the past couple of years . . . and they wonder why!
    CHATHAMS AMATUER PHOTOGRAPHERS RULE OK!

  6. Alex on 26 September 2009 at 14:40 says:

    Thanks for joining in. This battle is nearly won. http://monaxle.com/2009/07/08/section-44-in-chatham-high-street/comment-page-3/#comment-2687

  7. the slig on 27 September 2009 at 11:02 says:

    there are two types of copper. there’s the bobby who’s job it is to protect and serve you, and there’s the corporate enforcement officer who’s job is to make money for the government. they do this by enacting statute legislation. they can only do this if you give them your name and address. they call this joinder. if you don’t give them your name and address then you’ve not given them consent to contract with you… therefore they can’t enact statute legislation upon you. however, anti-terror laws mean it is an offence NOT to supply your name and address to a police man (corporate enforcement officer), so you have no choice but to contract with a police officer… if you don’t then it’s on with the cuffs and off to jail. for a full explanation of this (and other things besides), please watch this video by a very clever man called John Harris. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0IM7Hobd_k

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

Listen

No flash player!

It looks like you don't have flash player installed. Click here to go to Macromedia download page.


Watch





Lest We Connect The Crooked Family video Kick Up the Leaves video Impossible Loss Brigade video

Recent Comments

joe9t on The Pros and Cons of Eating Out – details
“ok maybe 20 was too much…10…”
- Wednesday 8 September 9:50pm
joe9t on The Pros and Cons of Eating Out – details
“i can’t say i’ve ever seen…”
- Wednesday 8 September 9:49pm
Hg on The Pros and Cons of Eating Out – details
“dAn – great. I’m off…”
- Wednesday 8 September 8:42pm
dAn on The Pros and Cons of Eating Out – details
“Actually, that depends… are the additional trinkets…”
- Wednesday 8 September 8:40pm
dAn on The Pros and Cons of Eating Out – details
“Still interested!:-P…”
- Wednesday 8 September 8:37pm

Free EP Downloads

Gigs

F(r)iends

Links

Meta