<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Burn All Witches &#8211; Counter Action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lupencrook.com/2009/10/13/burn-all-witches-counter-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lupencrook.com/2009/10/13/burn-all-witches-counter-action/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 01:10:57 -0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe9t</title>
		<link>http://www.lupencrook.com/2009/10/13/burn-all-witches-counter-action/comment-page-1/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe9t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lupencrook.com/?p=647#comment-629</guid>
		<description>I really love all three of the artists in questionable status here so here&#039;s my two cents

Iggy- NOOOOOOOOOOO! car insurance. i mean honestly. I have no arguement to defend old Ig.
John Lydon- I know the Lydon mindset is to &quot;get up all in their faces&quot; and what not but his string of ad didn&#039;t do that. He basically set himself up as a pantomine version of himself. After years of PiL trying to get away from it he has reverted right back to it
Sir Billy of Chatham- If it pays for another MBE&#039;s album I have no problems. He didn&#039;t actually appear in the commercial and I&#039;d like to think it bought in new converts to the cause. He&#039;s still a fucking genius</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really love all three of the artists in questionable status here so here&#8217;s my two cents</p>
<p>Iggy- NOOOOOOOOOOO! car insurance. i mean honestly. I have no arguement to defend old Ig.<br />
John Lydon- I know the Lydon mindset is to &#8220;get up all in their faces&#8221; and what not but his string of ad didn&#8217;t do that. He basically set himself up as a pantomine version of himself. After years of PiL trying to get away from it he has reverted right back to it<br />
Sir Billy of Chatham- If it pays for another MBE&#8217;s album I have no problems. He didn&#8217;t actually appear in the commercial and I&#8217;d like to think it bought in new converts to the cause. He&#8217;s still a fucking genius</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hg</title>
		<link>http://www.lupencrook.com/2009/10/13/burn-all-witches-counter-action/comment-page-1/#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator>Hg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lupencrook.com/?p=647#comment-627</guid>
		<description>I am fascinated. And a little disconcerted too, in the best possible way.  Nothing I say in the following should be construed as criticism of Dave Wise, for whose uncompromising stance I have immense respect.  But this is fertile territory that breeds many thoughts...

The Iggy Pop thing disappoints me.  It&#039;s a step too far.  But elsewhere, I&#039;ve praised John Lydon for continuing to do what he does best: fucking with people&#039;s heads.  Never do what they want you to do, even when &quot;they&quot; is &quot;us&quot;.  Who are we to cast judgement?

Who&#039;s having the last laugh?  The commercial organisation that thinks it&#039;s captured and tamed a former punk?  Or that self-same punk that sneers at the society that wants to be told what kind of butter to buy and is happy to wear a tweed jacket in the name of subverting the notion of capitalist choice?

Billy Childish providing music to Asda stretches my tolerance.  But if Tesco approached the Murderbirds tomorrow, what would I say?  Tell my friends that they should cast away all thoughts of financial security for themselves and their loved ones in the name of principle and ideology?

I can find no conclusions.  But the debate is indeed invigorating.  What do YOU think?  Play the game to win or lose?  Or opt out forever, whatever the consequences?  I end as I began... utterly fascinated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am fascinated. And a little disconcerted too, in the best possible way.  Nothing I say in the following should be construed as criticism of Dave Wise, for whose uncompromising stance I have immense respect.  But this is fertile territory that breeds many thoughts&#8230;</p>
<p>The Iggy Pop thing disappoints me.  It&#8217;s a step too far.  But elsewhere, I&#8217;ve praised John Lydon for continuing to do what he does best: fucking with people&#8217;s heads.  Never do what they want you to do, even when &#8220;they&#8221; is &#8220;us&#8221;.  Who are we to cast judgement?</p>
<p>Who&#8217;s having the last laugh?  The commercial organisation that thinks it&#8217;s captured and tamed a former punk?  Or that self-same punk that sneers at the society that wants to be told what kind of butter to buy and is happy to wear a tweed jacket in the name of subverting the notion of capitalist choice?</p>
<p>Billy Childish providing music to Asda stretches my tolerance.  But if Tesco approached the Murderbirds tomorrow, what would I say?  Tell my friends that they should cast away all thoughts of financial security for themselves and their loved ones in the name of principle and ideology?</p>
<p>I can find no conclusions.  But the debate is indeed invigorating.  What do YOU think?  Play the game to win or lose?  Or opt out forever, whatever the consequences?  I end as I began&#8230; utterly fascinated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.lupencrook.com/2009/10/13/burn-all-witches-counter-action/comment-page-1/#comment-626</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lupencrook.com/?p=647#comment-626</guid>
		<description>uncompromising integrity. to seek understanding and agreement would be missing the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uncompromising integrity. to seek understanding and agreement would be missing the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

